Is Asthma Clinical Remission Achievable by Inhaled Therapy? A Post-Hoc Analysis of Single Inhaler Triple Therapy with FF/UMEC/VI in the CAPTAIN Trial

27 Mar 2025
Introduction: The composite endpoint of clinical remission (CR) is a treatment goal for patients with asthma. It is currently unknown if CR is achievable in patients treated with inhaled therapy alone. This post-hoc analysis of the CAPTAIN Trial evaluated patients’ ability to achieve CR on FF/VI and FF/UMEC/VI. Methods: CAPTAIN, a phase IIIa RCT, investigated once-daily single-inhaler FF/UMEC/VI versus FF/VI in patients ≥18 years with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma despite maintenance ICS/LABA. CR was defined as no systemic corticosteroid use, no severe exacerbations, ACQ-5 total score <1.5, and change from baseline in trough FEV₁ ≥100mL. CR was assessed at Weeks 24 and 52 for FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 or 200/62.5/25mcg versus FF/VI 100/25 or 200/25mcg. Odds/risk ratios (OR/RR; 95% CIs) were calculated for Week 24 data. Missing data/study withdrawals/lost-to-follow-up were considered non-responders. Results: At Week 24, 31%(127/406) and 36%(146/408) of patients receiving FF/UMEC/VI 100 or 200 achieved CR versus 19%(77/407) and 26%(104/406) receiving FF/VI 100 or 200; similar achievements were seen for patients with data at Week 52 (FF/UMEC/VI 100: 30%[27/91]; 200: 38%[35/91]; FF/VI 100: 21%[18/87]; 200: 24%[22/91]). Patients receiving FF/UMEC/VI 100 were more likely to achieve CR at Week 24 than those receiving FF/VI 100 (OR: 1.93[1.39, 2.68], p<0.001; RR: 1.65[1.29, 2.12], p<0.001), as was seen for FF/UMEC/VI 200 versus FF/VI 200 (OR: 1.62[1.19, 2.19], p=0.002; RR: 1.40[1.13, 1.72], p=0.002). All p-values are nominally statistically significant. Discussion: A greater proportion of patients with FF/UMEC/VI demonstrated CR than FF/VI. CR is a feasible treatment goal for patients with moderate-to-severe asthma receiving FF/UMEC/VI and FF/VI. Funding: GSK (205715; NCT02924688)

Resource information

Respiratory conditions
  • Asthma
Respiratory topics
  • Inhalers
Type of resource
Abstract
Conference
Brasov 2025
Author(s)
Njira Lugogo1, John Oppenheimer2, Jodie Crawford3, Tom Corbridge4, Peter Howarth5, Emmeline Burrows4, Alison Moore5, Stephen G Noorduyn6,7, David Slade8, Stephen Weng9, Ian Pavord10 1Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, United States 2Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, United States 3Development Biostatistics, GSK, Brentford, Middlesex, United Kingdom 4US Medical Affairs, GSK, Durham, United States 5Global Medical Affairs, GSK, Brentford, Middlesex, United Kingdom 6Value Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GSK, Mississauga, Canada 7Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada 8US Medical Affairs, GSK, Collegeville, United States 9Respiratory Biostatistics, GSK, Stevenage, United Kingdom 10Respiratory Medicine Unit and Oxford Respiratory NIHR BRC, Oxford, United Kingdom and Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom